chris hemsworth

12 Strong is a Poor Man's Black Hawk Down by Ryan Hill

 
12strongmain.jpg

There haven’t been a lot of war films about the post-9/11 fighting in Afghanistan. Peter Berg’s Lone Survivor comes to mind, but most of the war on terror films center on Iraq: American Sniper, The Hurt Locker, HBO’s Generation Kill miniseries and Green Zone. 12 Strong tries to help fill that void.

12strong1.jpg

Chris Hemsworth and Michael Shannon star as the leaders of the 12 special forces soldiers – the 12 “strong,” if you will – into Afghanistan shortly after Sept. 11, 2001. They link up with an Afghani general and together start wreaking havoc on the Taliban, trying to loosen their stranglehold on the country. The Taliban has tanks and artillery, and yes the Americans have bombs, but the special forces soldiers are forced to use horses as their primary means of transportation through the mountains of Afghanistan.

There’s nothing particularly special about 12 Strong. The story of the first special forces team deployed to Afghanistan in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks is worth telling. More impressive is the fact that the soldiers rode on horses while fighting the Taliban. That’s awesome!

12strong2.jpg

So, why is 12 Strong so thoroughly mediocre?

Because I answered my own question. Everything about the film is mediocre.

Had the film been released in 2006 or 2007, the simplistic America is great! We will fix everything in Afghanistan! theme probably would’ve played like gangbusters. But in 2018, with fighting still going on over there and the politics behind the war on terror as complicated as ever, it feels like 12 Strong is missing the bigger picture.

12strong3.png

As far as the fighting goes, 12 Strong has plenty of it, but nothing that will wow or scare audiences. Director Nicolai Fuglsig is clearly going for a Black Hawk Down aesthetic with the fighting, which isn’t a surprise considering both films were produced by Jerry Bruckheimer. The fighting in Black Hawk Down may be what 12 Strong aims for, but there’s no comparison. 12 Strong doesn’t have the scope, intensity, or cinematic eye of director Ridley Scott. Despite sporting a script co-written by Oscar winner Ted Tally (The Silence of the Lambs), the characters are painfully one note. Hemsworth and Shannon may have all the charisma in the world, but even they can’t elevate a weak script into a good one.

12 Strong is watchable, and would make for good background noise once it hits television, but there’s too many war films that are far superior. Even Lone Survivor, which I wasn’t a huge fan of, is better in most every way.

Thor Brings on Ragnarok with a Wink and a Nudge by Ryan Hill

 
Thor_Ragnarok_Promo_Banner.jpg

Let’s be honest. Thor may do cool things with his magic hammer, but he’s one of the least interesting characters in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He’s not particularly funny, he’s difficult to connect with, and he’s, well … kind of boring. The first Thor was decent enough, but after the mess that was The Dark World, things needed a drastic makeover if Thor: Ragnarok would be worth anyone’s time.

Enter writer-director Taika Waititi, another art house director getting their big break on a comic book film. Waititi doesn’t have a high profile here in the U.S., with his highest grossing film, Hunt for the Wilderpeople, making a little more than $5 million. Waititi sounds like a major gamble, but look closer. Wilderpeople was a delight from beginning to end, and the director’s vampire mockumentary What We Do In The Shadows is a comedy classic.

thor-ragnarok-hulk-1-600x316.jpg

Maybe to assuage fears that Waititi wasn’t up to the task of Thor: Ragnarok, Marvel released a sort of preview of what to expect with Team Thor, a short detailing what the God of Thunder was up to during the events of Captain America: Civil War. Some of the jokes from Team Thor even made it into Ragnarok.

Ragnarok finds Thor learning that he has an older sister, Hela (a delicious Cate Blanchett), the Goddess of Death. The only thing that’s kept her from destroying Asgard all these years has been their father Odin, who imprisoned her. The problem is Odin at death’s door, and once he dies – which he does early on – Hela is freed, and quickly returns to wreak havoc. Things get tricky when Thor is captured by Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) and becomes a slave/prisoner who works for free under the control of the Grand Master (Jeff Goldblum). Thor is forced to fight to the death in a sci-fi gladiator arena, and runs into his old pal Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), who’s been missing since the end of Avengers: Age of Ultron.

giphy (30).gif

Ragnarok isn’t the best Marvel film, but it is one of the best, and is definitely the funniest. None of the other Marvel films come close. Not even the Guardians of the Galaxy movies.

Chris Hemsworth has always been funny, but he takes it to another level under Waititi’s direction. His dry, silly brand of humor works perfectly with Hemsworth. Waititi injects a lot of the humor himself, playing Korg, a character made up entirely of rock. There’s also fun cameos galore, and the supporting cast, especially Jeff Goldblum, is clearly having a blast. Ragnarok is the first time Hulk has been featured as someone who does more than just smash things, teaming with Thor to make an intergalactic odd couple. Blanchett’s Hela, despite being a typical “big bad,” has some fun moments, and even Tom Hiddleston’s Loki is more enjoyable than usual. It should be noted that while I’ve enjoyed Loki, I’ve always found him a bit overrated. He’s never as fun as he could be.

giphy (32).gif

Anyone familiar with Waititi’s previous films will delight in Ragnarok. This isn’t a case of an art house director cashing in on a studio film or getting overwhelmed with the jump from working with a $2 million budget to $180 million. Marvel wisely let Waititi do his own thing, and the result is Thor: Ragnarok is exactly the entertaining and joyful ride one would expect from a $180 million budgeted Taika Waititi film.